Justa, a Proselyte: "There is amongst us one Justa, a Syro-Phoenician, by race a Canaanite, whose daughter was oppressed with a grievous disease. And she came to our Lord, crying out, and entreating that He would heal her daughter. But He, being asked also by us, said, 'It is not lawful to heal the Gentiles, who are like to dogs on account of their using various meats and practices, while the table in the kingdom has been given to the sons of Israel.' But she, hearing this, and begging to partake like a dog of the crumbs that fall from this table, having changed what she was, by living like the sons of the kingdom, she obtained healing for her daughter, as she asked. For she being a Gentile, and remaining in the same course of life, He would not have healed had she remained a Gentile, on account of its not being lawful to heal her as a Gentile." (The Clementine Homilies — Pseudo-Clementine Literature, Hom. 2, Ch. 19, trans. by Thomas Smith 1886)
This anecdote from the Clementine Homilies as told by Peter reinterprets Jesus’ interaction with the Syro-Phoenician woman in Matthew 15:22-28 as a teaching about spiritual and dietary purification; and redefines the Israel-Gentile distinction not as an ethnic division but as a condition of being characterized by ethical and dietary practices. Specifically, it links Gentileness to the consumption of forbidden foods (flesh-eating); and Israeliteness to abstention from animal flesh cum adherence to a non-violent vegan ethic. This contrasts with Matthew 15:21-28, where the emphasis is placed on the Cannanite woman’s faith and Jesus' mission to Israel. The Pseudo-Clementine account deepens this narrative by tying healing to an ethical transformation that includes dietary purity.
It follows that Jesus’ mission, particularly as portrayed in Pseudo-Clementine literature, included dietary ethics as a means of spiritual transformation. Below is a detailed analysis of how this narrative, in contrast with Matthew 15:21-28, supports an early Christian vision of nonviolence, dietary purity, and a vegan ethic (cf. Shane La Roche 2025).
1. The Reinterpretation of the Israel-Gentile Distinction
Traditional Christian theology often treats the Israel-Gentile distinction as an ethnic or covenantal category. However, the Pseudo-Clementines redefine this distinction through a moral and dietary lens:
A. Gentiles are associated with meat consumption, which is likened to impurity and spiritual distance.
B. Israel is defined not by lineage but by living righteously, rejecting animal flesh, and practicing nonviolence.
This interpretation aligns with the Essenic-Ebionite tradition, which viewed dietary purity as an essential part of divine law and spiritual enlightenment.
However, it is important to note that Matthew 15:21-28 is not only about faith but also about who constitutes the lost sheep of Israel, i.e., ethnicity. Jesus' response to the Syro-Phoenician woman initially emphasizes that his mission is to the house of Israel, yet her persistent plea leads to an expansion of that mission beyond ethnic boundaries. In the Pseudo-Clementine reinterpretation, this expansion is tied explicitly to ethical transformation, including dietary practices.
2. Dietary Transformation as a Path to Healing
Justa’s transformation in the narrative is not merely about faith—it is about changing her way of life. Jesus does not heal her daughter immediately; rather, healing follows her adoption of Israeliteness, which includes a vegan ethic. This suggests that:
A. Spiritual transformation requires ethical conversion, including dietary changes.
B. Healing and salvation are tied to nonviolence, reflecting the Messianic vision of peace.
C. True discipleship is not about ethnicity but about moral purity, which includes rejecting animal exploitation.
This contrasts with Matthew 15:21-28, where the emphasis is placed on the Syro-Phoenician woman’s faith and Jesus' mission to Israel. The Pseudo-Clementine account deepens this narrative by tying healing to an ethical transformation that includes dietary purity.
3. Vegan Theology in Early Christianity
Early Jewish Christianity practiced veganism and opposed animal sacrifice. Their teachings align with the idea that:
A. Jesus came to abolish animal sacrifice, as seen in the Gospel of Matthew (9:13, 12:7) and the Gospel of the Ebionites (Epiphanius, Panarion 30.16.5).
B. Early followers of Jesus rejected flesh-eating as part of their ethical code.
C. The Kingdom of God envisioned a world without animal exploitation (Isaiah 11:6-9).
The Pseudo-Clementines reflect this early Christian vegan ideal, suggesting that belonging to the Kingdom of God requires abstaining from flesh-eating.
4. Implications for Christian Vegan Ethics Today
This narrative challenges the modern Christian acceptance of meat consumption by demonstrating that:
A. Faith alone was not enough—ethical living, including dietary purity, was central to early Christianity.
B. Jesus’ mission included animal liberation, aligning with vegan theology.
C. Rejecting animal flesh as food is a sign of spiritual transformation, just as it was for Justa.
By reclaiming this long-suppressed ethical framework, Christian veganism can be seen as a return to the earliest teachings of Jesus and his followers.
5. Conclusion: Jesus, Justa, and the Vegan Gospel
The story of Justa in the Pseudo-Clementines redefines who belongs to God’s kingdom—not by birth, but by ethical choices, particularly regarding diet and nonviolence. Justa’s transformation from a Gentile (meat-eater) to an Israelite (vegan) mirrors the deeper spiritual call of Jesus’ teachings: Compassion, purity, and the rejection of violence against all sentient beings.
This interpretation not only strengthens the case for vegan theology but also invites modern Christians to reconsider how their dietary choices reflect their spiritual commitments.
コメント