Proof that the Anti-Vegan Paul is an Apostle of Satan. By Lavern Gooding. Ed. Dr. Chapman Chen

Excerpt: I would like to... spend a bit more time on... food that has been sacrificed to idols, for Paul teaches something very different from what the other apostles and Yeshua taught.

We find in the Book of Acts that Peter and the other apostles the leaders of the church make it very clear their letter to the church in Antioch and it's the letter that Paul was given that we are not supposed to eat foodsacrificed to the idols. No questions about it; no exceptions given: do not eat food sacrificed to idols.

Then we find in the book of Revelation:- Yeshua gives a letter to the church in criteria and he addresses this matter and he condemns people from that church who have been eating food sacrificed to idols and the term that he puts to it or gives it is that these people believe they have deeper truths that allow them to have uh or to live sexually immoral lives and to eat food sacrificed to idols they believe in these deeper truths.

Well Paul talks about having superior knowledge when it comes to food sacrifice to idols in 1 Corinthians. So it really is Yeshua addressing this idea of having superior knowledge or deeper truths when it comes to food sacrifice to idols and it's very clear that Yeshua condemns people who are doing this it doesn't matter what excuse Paul gives it doesn't matter his reasoning for it we are not to eat food sacrifice to idols but according to Paul you can you only need to read verse 10 in Chapter 8 of 1 Corinthians and you will see that Paul is talking about believers being in the temple eating food sacrificed to idols and he says if you observe such a person who has superior knowledge so he's describing someone eating food in the temple and this is a believer and he does not condemn the person for doing it; he only has a problem with it if someone else another believer who doesn't have the superior knowledge; if they should see you then their conscience is going to be offended and they may stumble,

while this is contrary it's completely contrary I can't stress it enough to what Yeshua and the other apostles taught.

Peter explains it in Clementine's Homilies that when we eat food sacrificed to idols we are in fact sitting down and eating with demons and this is why we must not do it. If you eat food sacrifice to idols, you are sitting down and sharing a meal with demons.

Now going back to the church in Thyatira, what we see here is another red flag:- Yeshua is pointing out that this teaching comes from Paul now you ask why is this.

Well it's because of the mentioning of the prophetess from Thyatira. Yeshua is pointing to a woman from Thyatira who heads this church and is teaching people sexual immorality and this idea that they can eat food sacrifice to idols. well I've already established that Paul taught this same thing but what you may not be aware is that in the Book of Acts we are told that Paul baptized a woman from Thyatira -- a rich merchant woman from Thyatira; this is the first person that we hear of Paul baptizing in Asia Minor and it's a woman from Thyatira and then... when the book of Revelation was written we find Yeshua condemning a woman from Thyatira for teaching the very same things that Paul did so.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpt link: https://www.hkbnews.net/post/proof-that-the-anti-vegan-paul-is-an-apostle-of-satan-by-lavern-gooding-ed-dr-chapman-chen

Full Transcript of the Video by Lavern Gooding https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jVBoPCnQ7c&list=FLnIswVET4MPwoMGrfuCTrMw&index=2&t=41s

0:00

hello and thank you for joining me may this video be a blessing to you and your loved ones and may honor and glorify God

0:05

in this kingdom this video is going to be a collection and a summary of videos I've made in the past speaking out against apostle Paul

0:12

showing him to be a false apostle it is my hope that i can create a one-stop one-shot kind of video

0:19

for all of the evidence against Paul and there are mounds of it for your convenience I'm going to

0:26

include in the description box of index is so that you can simply go to the different parts of the video that deals

0:33

with a particular argument in this way it will make it easier for you to respond either by way of comments or

0:39

with a video response and i do hope that you will do so especially if i am in air if you can

0:47

show me that I'm in air i want you to do so so i encourage video responses

0:52

whether you deal with the whole video or just with parts

0:57

with uh one or two of the arguments that I'm presenting because if i am in heir no one wants to

1:05

know about it more than me because i understand the severe consequences that will be attached to me teaching that

1:13

Paul is a false apostle if in fact he was a true apostle of Christ if i am calling a man of God a liar

1:21

then i am going to be severely punished for it so i do want to know but

1:27

understand that i require actual evidence of it i require you to show me

1:33

by way of Scripture that I'm in air do not think for a moment that you will be able to argue from the heart or by

1:41

way of emotion for example I'm constantly sent

1:47

private messages or comments telling me or suggesting that if God wanted to do

1:53

it he could do it well yes if God wanted to he could but that's not an argument

1:59

for him actually having done it if God wanted to yes he could create a book

2:06

made up of 66 books that would include all of his written word and that it would be infallible and he would not

2:13

allow anyone including Satan to corrupt it he would not allow anyone to add or take

2:20

away from it if God wanted to he could do this

2:25

the question is did God want to do this was that his intention

2:31

and did God do it well i tell you there is no evidence whatsoever that God did

2:36

this and so don't argue that he did something simply because he could have done it if

2:43

he wanted to now regarding the Bible being the infallible word of God and including all

2:48

of his written word there is not one passage not one piece of Scripture that suggests this is the case

2:55

and so if you're going to tell me that the Bible is infallible and that it includes all of God's written word

3:01

then show me by way of Scripture if I'm wrong if you can prove this to me

3:08

then i will be able to accept Paul as a true apostle

3:14

but i doubt very much that you will be able to do it

3:19

now regarding Paul i understand that he includes some truth in his teachings yes

3:25

you will be able to quote some passages that line up with the teachings of Yeshua and with the other apostles Paul

3:32

does do this i understand this i admit this but it's not an issue of whether or not

3:38

Paul has some truth if some of his teachings do line up with Yeshua and the other apostles the problem is with those

3:46

passages and those teachings that do not line up the problem is with those teachings that contradict

3:52

those teachings and commandments of Yeshua and the other apostles the fact that Paul

3:59

can include you know 50 of his writings that line up with the other writers that's irrelevant

4:06

if 50 contradict and teach something entirely different and it is those passages it is

4:13

those teachings that we need to focus on it's not enough that he'd be right 50 of

4:20

the time the 50 of the time that he is wrong and that he contradicts Yeshua and the other

4:26

apostles it is those teachings that will lead people to destruction

4:32

now regarding the Bible and I've talked about this in a good number of my videos there is evidence that the Bible does

4:38

not include all of God's written word for example in second estras this is one

4:43

of the 14 books of the apocrypha it tells us that there were 94 books and

4:49

this is going back prior to Yeshua coming on the scene it tells us there were 94 books 24 were for the general

4:56

public for anyone and everyone to read but there were 70 books that were for the initiate only and this is confirmed

5:03

in a New Testament writing called the gospel of nicodemus where it talks about

5:09

the book that contains 70. then in the writings of Peter

5:15

non-canonical writings known as clementine's Homilies Peter explains

5:21

that there are falsehoods that are placed alongside Scripture there are

5:26

falsehoods placed within Scripture Satan is given great latitude in his ability

5:32

to deceive people and Peter makes it very plain he he

5:38

comes right out and tells us that there are falsehoods placed within Scripture and they are there to test us

5:45

they are there to separate those people who hear the voice of the evil shepherd

5:52

and follow him these Scriptures these falsehoods rather are placed alongside Scripture to

5:58

separate the sheep from the goats for the sheep will hear the voice will recognize the voice of the good shepherd

6:05

and will ignore and will walk away from the voice of the evil shepherd

6:11

so there is evidence that the Bible is or is fallible and does include

6:17

falsehoods in it and that the Bible does not include all of God's written word and there are other passages as well for

6:25

example jude quotes enoch he quotes a passage from enoch

6:32

and Yeshua also speaks about the fact that the sadducees didn't know Scripture

6:39

before he talks about marriage being in heaven and the fact that when we are in heaven we will be as the angels and that

6:46

they do not marry well that's not found in the Bible and yet Yeshua describes it as being

6:53

Scripture but that is described as well in the writings of enoch so we have both

6:58

Yeshua and jude referring to and actually quoting from

7:04

enoch showing us that there is more to God's written word than what is found in the Bible so if

7:10

there can be books missing if the canon process kept some of God's

7:16

written word out of the Bible then surely there could have been books added to the Bible that never should

7:22

have been and then regarding the 66 books of the Protestant Bible and

7:28

this is one of the smallest Bibles found in mainstream Christianity 66 books

7:34

and the mark of the beast is 666 and then you look at the makeup of the

7:39

Protestant Bible we find in the Old Testament that there are three sets of 13

7:45

three sets of 13 books and then in the New Testament Paul writes 13 books so we have these

7:54

sets of 13 13 of course being a number of the occult and of Satan and 13

8:01

representing death why would God create such a book and

8:06

and then tell us it's the infellow or his infallible word and that it includes

8:12

all of his word why would God create a book that has connections to the number

8:18

666 and 13 i tell you he would not there are

8:23

many red flags found in Scripture pointing to Paul being a false apostle

8:29

and pointing to the Protestant Bible is not being the infallible word of God and not including all of his written word

8:37

now having explained that let's have a look at the teachings of Paul I'd like to begin with his conversion

8:44

stories where we find three different conversion stories in the Book of Acts but then there's a fourth story found in

8:51

Galatians where Peter talks about the events following directly after his

8:58

Damascus experience so it's his post Damascus experience but it is still tied

9:04

into his conversion so there's actually four stories that we need to look at when looking at Paul's

9:10

conversion

9:20

now in the first conversion story as it's found in the Book of Acts it tells

9:25

us that Paul is on the road to Damascus and then

9:31

he is knocked to the ground by this blinding light and he is surrounded by this light there is no

9:37

mention of his companions being surrounded by the light only him and then we are told that there is

9:43

this voice and his companions heard the voice in the

9:49

second conversion story it's very different it tells us that

9:55

his companions heard something but they didn't recognize it as a voice they didn't understand what was being said

10:03

this is important because it it shows a contradiction in the story but it's also

10:08

important when looking at who Paul is speaking to in the other two stories

10:15

for the first conversion story is really a narrative by Luke and we have to assume that he learned the story from

10:22

Paul himself because he was companion who paused now also in the first

10:28

conversion story we are told that immediately after his conversion Paul began preaching in Damascus and then

10:34

after a while there were those Jews who became angered with him and wanted to

10:40

murder him and so Paul had to make an escape and then after his escape he went to Jerusalem so

10:47

immediately after his conversion started preaching in Damascus

10:52

now uh regarding Ananias Ananias is seen as a second witness in this first

10:58

conversion story and the same thing in the second conversion story now

11:03

in the second conversion story it's actually Paul himself who is speaking and he's speaking to the Jews and Jewish

11:11

religious leaders and so Paul had to stress the importance of a second witness who is

11:18

supposedly Ananias and what Paul tells us is that Ananias

11:24

is also the one who had a vision from Yeshua and was given instructions to

11:29

give to Paul of which Ananias was told to tell Paul that he is going to be sent to the

11:36

gentiles so we find that this idea of Paul going to the gentiles was first given to this

11:44

second witness who is Ananias and Paul explains it in this fashion because he's speaking to

11:51

Jewish religious leaders and he had to be able to provide a second witness

11:58

to the things that he was claiming but in the third conversion story Paul is

12:03

speaking to King Agrippa and he leaves out Ananias altogether no mention of him

12:10

whatsoever in this third conversion story Paul is stressing everything about

12:15

himself it's all about him in this story no one else could

12:21

understand what was being said it it's just him he hears from Yeshua directly

12:27

and Yeshua tells him that he is going to be spreading the good news or he's going to be teaching

12:35

both to the Jews and the gentiles but they are going to be angered with him

12:40

both the Jews and the gentiles so very different stories depending

12:47

on who Paul is speaking to and this is Paul's character for Paul

12:53

tells us that he becomes whoever he has to become when speaking to different people

13:00

whatever the environment whoever he's with he changes himself he becomes who he has

13:07

to in order to appease those people and that's what we see Paul doing it's why

13:15

he lies as he does then regarding the letter to the Galatians

13:21

and speaking to these gentiles again it's all about Paul and he's trying to stress this fact that Jesus taught him

13:29

directly he tells us he didn't learn from the apostles after his conversion

13:34

he didn't seek out the apostles he didn't go to them for teachings but rather he went to Arabia well this is

13:40

very different from that first conversion story that Luke tells us according to Paul

13:46

immediately after his conversion he went to Arabia and it's in Arabia where he learned from Jesus himself he didn't

13:52

have to learn from the apostles so we are supposed to believe that Yeshua after his resurrection and after

13:59

appearing to the disciples and other witnesses he then ascended to heaven but

14:05

he came back down to teach Paul directly to teach Paul one on one

14:12

this is what Paul would have us believe everything he learned he learned directly from Yeshua well the problem

14:19

with this is that Yeshua warns us that people will claim this Yeshua tells us

14:25

if someone says they saw me in the desert or saw me in the wilderness you should not believe them don't

14:32

believe them something else most Christians don't realize is that Simon the magician

14:39

claims something very similar we find in the Clementine Homilies that Simon the magician who had a number of debates

14:46

with Peter claimed the same thing Simon the magician claimed to have learned directly from Yeshua

14:54

and so Paul and Simon the magician have this in common both claiming to have learned

15:01

directly from Christ yet no one no Christian would say that

15:08

Simon the magician is someone that you should listen to that Simon the magician is a true apostle

15:15

my brothers and sisters it's important to look at these red flags

15:20

the fact that the very first place Paul went to after his conversion is the

15:25

house of Judas is a red flag Jesus and God the father is showing us with

15:33

these red flags for those people who have discernment the fact that Paul

15:40

after his conversion after being blinded the first place he went to while still blind was the house of Judas this is a

15:47

warning for us we know that when Scripture speaks about the house of

15:54

anyone it is talking about their lineage for example Yeshua came from the house

15:59

of David and we find in Paul's conversion story that he goes to the house of Judas well yes we know that

16:06

this is not the Judas who was one of the 12 apostles but the the phrase the house

16:12

of Judas is a warning to us that Paul is a false apostle and there

16:18

are many such warnings found in Scripture and I've already spoken about some of

16:25

them the fact that Jesus warned not to believe someone if they claim to have seen him in the desert or the wilderness

16:33

all right uh let's uh let's look at some other facts about Paul

16:40

in addition to his conversion stories there's descriptions of false apostles

16:46

and false teachers that we need to look at

16:57

Yeshua has been very faithful to the elected he's shown great wisdom in leaving identification markers in

17:03

Scripture to help us identify false teachers and in regards to Paul we find three

17:11

specific identification markers to help us identify him as a false apostle the

17:17

first is in the warning that Christ gives us regarding the yeast of the Pharisees for Paul himself tells us that

17:25

he is a Pharisee among Pharisees and this isn't just something that he considered himself prior to the

17:31

conversion that he went through but he actually refers to himself still

17:38

as a Pharisee late in his life and his ministry so Paul never stops thinking of himself

17:45

as a Pharisee and Yeshua warns us about the yeast of the Pharisees then there's

17:50

the fact that Paul is a Roman citizen and we know that Rome is part of the

17:56

beast system Rome is one of the beasts that are spoken about in prophecy we see this in

18:04

uh nebuchadnezzar's dream of the statue and daniel's interpretation of that dream for we know that Rome is part of

18:12

that statue and that Rome is one of the beasts and Paul is a Roman citizen then

18:18

there's the fact that Paul comes from the tribe of Benjamin and the tribe of Benjamin is known as the wolf for the

18:26

insignia of Benjamin of that tribe is the wolf and just to drive this point home I'm

18:34

going to now read from a non-canonical book known as the testament of Benjamin

18:39

and the testament of Benjamin is one of 12 books or 12

18:44

writings that make up the book known as the testament of the 12 patriarchs and I'm going to be reading from this book

18:50

here it's titled the last books of the Bible and the forgotten books of Eden

18:55

I'm reading from chapter 2 verse 25 and just to explain this each of the 12 testaments

19:03

is the one of the 12 leaders of the tribes of Benjamin the 12 sons of Jacob

19:09

they are giving their last testament while on their deathbed to their

19:15

children and this is part of what Benjamin has to say and i shall no longer be called a

19:21

ravening wolf on account of your ravages but a worker of the lord distributing food to them that work what is good

19:29

so this is a prophecy from Benjamin that his tribe his

19:34

children his descendants will be known as ravenous wolves well i believe

19:40

Yeshua is referring to this prophecy when he talks about wolves in sheep's

19:45

clothing it's not just a way of describing false teachers that they are woes in

19:52

sheep clothing but it's actually identifying one particular wolf coming

19:57

from the tribal Benjamin and that person is apostle Paul so i don't believe it's a coincidence

20:03

that Paul is identified by these three markers he's these three

20:10

things it is Yeshua's way it is God's way of

20:15

identifying Paul as a false apostle and that his falsehoods his false teachings

20:22

have been placed alongside the true Scriptures all right let's now have a closer look

20:29

at Paul's explanation of where he received his Revelations from for he

20:34

tells us that he received all of his Revelations all of his understanding of Yeshua and of the cross of salvation

20:42

directly from Yeshua

21:12

when looking at the evidence for or against Paul i believe it's helpful to look at those teachers that we know

21:17

without question are false teachers now a good example of such a person is Simon

21:22

the magician whom I've already spoken briefly on I'd like to look at some of the

21:27

similarities between Simon and Paul now I've already spoken about Paul's conversion and how

21:34

his description of his conversion story and the fact that he claims to have

21:40

gained all of his knowledge from Christ is similar to what Simon claims now

21:46

Simon claims to have received his Revelation and understanding of salvation of God and of Christ from an

21:52

apparation of Christ he never walked with Christ in the flesh

21:58

and he states this but he claims that his knowledge and his Revelation is superior to that of those people who

22:06

actually walked with Christ during his ministry while he walked the earth in the flesh

22:12

while Paul is similar to Simon in that he never knew Christ while he

22:19

walked the earth in the flesh so they have this in common now

22:24

Paul doesn't describe Christ as having been an aberration that

22:30

taught him he does tell us however that he never learned anything that he knows from the

22:37

apostles he never sought them out rather he went into Arabia and he spent several years there now

22:45

if it wasn't an operation if it wasn't Christ coming down from heaven

22:50

and instead of that he received his knowledge by way of visions and dreams well then it's still similar to what

22:58

Simon claims Paul really does believe that he had superior knowledge superior Revelation and

23:05

understanding when it came to Christ salvation the law and the kingdom of God there's no

23:12

question that Paul felt that he had superior knowledge and Revelation and this is similar to what Simon

23:20

claimed now Paul doesn't come right out and tell the apostles this he doesn't tell

23:25

those people in the churches that he's writing to that he is without question superior to

23:33

the other apostles he does however make some claims that certainly alludes to this and it leaves no question really

23:40

that Paul believed something similar to Simon in that he was

23:45

superior to that of the other apostles now i understand that Paul says

23:50

that he is the least of the apostles but this is false humility and we can

23:55

see this when we read the other things that Paul states for example Paul claims to have been

24:03

picked by God to have been chosen by God even before he was born so according to

24:08

Paul he is a special vessel he is a special instrument that was chosen by God

24:15

even before he was born so this is one way of asserting his authority leaving

24:20

no doubt no question that he is someone that we should look up to that he has special Revelation and

24:28

understanding then we have Paul referring to his message the message that he is spreading

24:34

as being his gospel he actually uses the words my gospel or the phrase my gospel twice

24:41

so he is bragging in a way or stating his authority when he is saying it's his

24:49

gospel not the gospel of Christ but his gospel

24:54

Paul also talks about tearing the law down he actually uses the words

24:59

tore down Paul claims to have tore the law down and that he would be making a huge

25:05

mistake if he was to rebuild the law that he already tore down now in making this claim regarding the

25:12

law there is no one else who does this this or i should say Paul is the only one

25:18

making this claim so again Paul is showing his authority showing that he

25:24

has greater Revelation teaching this new teaching regarding the law

25:30

no one else taught it and certainly Yeshua himself never taught it Paul also claims to have superior

25:36

knowledge when it comes to understanding the food laws about eating food sacrifice to idols now

25:44

we have the apostles themselves giving Paul a letter and stating emphatically

25:49

that we are not to eat food sacrifice to idols but we find in first Corinthians that Paul talks about having superior

25:56

knowledge when it comes to food sacrifice to idols so once again Paul asserting that he has been given greater

26:03

Revelation and understanding regarding these things than what the other apostles had

26:35

Paul instructs those people that he converts to think of him as their spiritual father well this goes against

26:42

the instructions of Christ Christ is very clear he's emphatic about this that we are to call no man father

26:49

and he is of course speaking spiritually we should not think of anyone as our

26:54

spiritual father except for God the father our creator but Paul comes along

27:00

and tells people that they should think of him as their spiritual father well this is once again

27:06

Paul claiming to have a greater Revelation what he's basically saying is what

27:12

Yeshua taught the apostles was only for that time period and only

27:18

for those apostles but now now that he's resurrected he's given me this new information new knowledge a

27:25

new Revelation and you should think of me as your spiritual father and this is of course the reason that the catholic

27:33

church has this tradition where priests are called father and they think of the pope

27:40

as the holy father so these lies

27:45

have crept into the church because of the teachings of Paul and it comes from his belief that he was given

27:52

greater knowledge greater Revelation or new Revelation that the other apostles did not have

28:00

but worse than any of this is the fact that Paul told philemon in his letter to

28:05

philemon that he should think of him as having saved his soul this is what Paul

28:12

actually tells philemon in the new living translation it actually describes Paul

28:18

is saying you owe me your very soul well this goes against everything that

28:26

is taught in Scripture none of the other apostles would ever make the claim that anyone owes them their very soul

28:34

and yet Paul makes that statement and it's a condemning statement

28:39

it should leave no question no doubt that Paul is a false apostle for this is

28:44

exactly the kind of thing that we would expect Simon the magician to say

28:49

Simon the magician was so full of himself even though we don't see it in any writing that he states that people

28:56

owe him the fact is Simon did believe this Simon was very boastful very

29:03

prideful in this way and making this claim that someone holds him their very soul well

29:08

it shows that he really is a false teacher now there's one more point I'd like to

29:15

make regarding Paul's pride and the fact that he thought he had greater authority than the other apostles

29:21

it comes in his statement that Peter was an apostle to the Jews while he

29:27

Paul had been chosen to be the apostle to the gentiles not one of many not a

29:33

apostle to the gentiles but the apostle to the gentiles

29:38

this shows that Paul is a liar and i say this because Paul was at the council in

29:44

Jerusalem when Peter himself stated that he was in fact chosen to be the mouth

29:51

that the gentiles would hear the gospel from Peter very clearly states this that the

29:58

gentiles would hear the gospel from him and yet we find Paul stating that Peter

30:04

was an apostle to the Jews while he was the apostle to the gentiles

30:10

this shows without question if people were honest if they would actually read

30:15

the Bible with an open heart seeking the truth if they would stop following the

30:22

traditions of man it would be obvious when Paul makes this statement that he is contradicting Peter

30:31

he is telling those people that he's writing to hey if there's

30:37

any confusion regarding who you should believe believe me because Paul

30:43

or because Peter was chosen for the Jews but me myself i Paul was chosen to come to you

30:51

and so it is me that you should listen to

31:02

the idea that there are no contradictions in the Bible is a fairly recent teaching we know this because we

31:08

only need to go back to the time of martin luther and read his writings and we would see that martin luther himself

31:13

believed there were contradictions in the Bible he went so far as to say that the epistle of James was one of straw

31:20

and that it should be burned and the reason is because martin luther clearly understood that James talked something

31:27

very different from apostle Paul martin luther understood that James did

31:34

not teach the same thing as Paul and this is why he said that epistle should be burned

31:40

he chose Paul over James now there are Christians as well who

31:46

understand that Paul teaches something very different than the other apostles and even Yeshua himself these Christians

31:52

are known as dispensationalists they recognize they understand that Paul

31:58

is teaching something new and something very different from that of Yeshua and the other apostles but they rationalize

32:05

and justify the teachings of Paul in the form of a doctrine in theology

32:11

known as dispensational now the idea here is that there are

32:17

different ages different stages in our history and we enter into new covenants

32:23

it is God's way of drawing us closer to him and according to dispensation all this we entered into a a new period or a

32:31

new age with the birth of the church and prior to that we had the teachings

32:36

of Yeshua and the apostles but those teachings were for the Jews only

32:41

dispensationalists actually make this claim that the teachings of Yeshua were never meant for the gentile were never

32:49

meant for pagans that the teachings of Yeshua in his entire ministry was for the Jews only

32:56

and so too were the teachings of the apostles and so dispensational this

33:01

separate the teachings of Paul from that of the other apostles and Yeshua

33:07

so this it actually it amazes me i i can't imagine that

33:13

thinking behind this because they see they recognize that Paul is

33:19

teaching something very different but rather than call him a false apostle

33:25

they say hey this was God at work here God picked Paul to actually build the

33:32

church that the church is really built on the teachings and the Revelations of Paul rather than the teachings and the

33:40

Revelations and the instructions and commands of Yeshua and the teachings of the other apostles

33:46

it blows my mind that Christians will go so far as to rationalize and justify the

33:54

teachings of a false apostle now then it is very clear to some

34:00

Christians that there there is a different gospel being taught by Paul than what Yeshua

34:06

taught they understand this and yet they love the world so much they love their sin so

34:13

much that they are willing to accept this false apostle even though they see his teachings as

34:19

being something new and something different from Yeshua they so love their sin

34:26

that they accept the lies of Paul over the truth of Yeshua and the true

34:31

apostles this is why i say there actually are two different Christs with two different

34:38

gospels and two different paths two salvation being taught in Scripture Yeshua and the true apostles

34:45

are teaching the true gospel and that the true path to the kingdom of

34:50

God the narrow difficult path that Christ lit up

34:57

showing us that he is the path that what he taught his teachings and his commandments are

35:03

living waters that we need to drink up

35:08

but Paul teaches something very different Paul tries to drown us with his lies

35:14

the words and the teachings that come from the mouth are of Paul are nothing but the lies of Satan Satan

35:22

is using Paul as an instrument to spread his lies and so we do see a very

35:27

different gospel in a different path being taught by Paul Paul tells us the law is tore down he in fact tore the law

35:34

down and that it would be a mistake to rebuild it Paul tells us that it is by faith alone

35:40

Paul talks about original sin and total depravity which Yeshua and the other apostles never taught

35:47

these are all new teachings by Paul supposedly new Revelations given to Paul

35:53

by Christ well these are false teachings and it is a different gospel two very different

36:00

messiahs are taught in the Bible one is the true messiah the other is an

36:05

imitation so we have the true messiah and an imitation messiah being taught

36:11

and you must decide who it is you are going to follow are you going to follow the voice of the good shepherd or the

36:16

voice of the evil shepherd are you going to follow the shepherd that teaches that we must stop sinning must not sin

36:25

must subdue sin must follow the commandments and teachings of Yeshua or are you going to

36:30

believe the teachings of the imitation Christ that tells us the law is done

36:36

away with that you cannot out sin God's grace that once you confess Christ as your lord you are saved from that point

36:43

on the judgment day is done away with for you that once you confess Christ is your

36:48

lord you automatically receive the holy spirit even though we find in the Book of Acts the story of Simon the magician

36:57

being told he could not receive the gift of the holy spirit and even though those Christians had been baptized by philip

37:05

they had been water baptized and yet they had still not received the holy spirit well this shows that just because

37:11

you confess Christ is your lord you do not automatically receive the holy spirit this is a very different Christ

37:18

in a different path supposedly to salvation being taught a different gospel being taught by apostle

37:24

Paul and you need to recognize the two different gospels that are being taught

37:29

one messiah one Christ tells us that salvation is by faith and works

37:36

the true apostles tell us salvation is by faith and works it is not by faith

37:42

alone so are you going to believe them or are you going to believe Paul when he tells

37:47

us the law is done away with and that you cannot out sin God's grace that is by faith salvation is by faith alone you

37:53

must choose choose who you will serve which messiah because there are two very

37:59

clearly different messiahs being taught in Scripture

42:06

Satan has convinced many Christians that they should not read books that fall outside of the 66 books that make up the

42:12

Protestant Bible within Protestantism this is known as sola scriptura but worse than that there

42:18

are many Christians who have been deceived into believing that they should really be focusing on the 13 epistles of

42:24

the 13th apostle so these Paulinus will focus on

42:30

the 13th apostles 13 epistles that are found within the 66 books of the

42:35

Protestant Bible but i tell you this is a lie of Satan Satan has worked very hard to eliminate

42:43

as much of God's written word as what he can and the reason is is because these other writings shed light on the false

42:50

teachings of Paul and Paul is an apostle of Satan now

42:56

i say this and i use this term apostle of Satan because Satan himself talks

43:02

about sending his apostles we find this in clementine's harmonies for

43:07

Peter tells us that during the 40 days that Yeshua was in the desert and during that period when he was tempted by Satan

43:15

Satan actually tells Christ that he is going to be sending his apostles

43:22

so we do have apostles of Satan we are given this warning by Satan

43:29

himself and certainly i don't think many people would argue that Simon the magician was one such

43:36

apostle unfortunately Christians or most Christians fail to understand that Paul

43:42

is also one of Satan's apostles now I'd like to speak a little bit to

43:50

the Damascus document which is one of the writings that are part of the dead sea scrolls and the reason is is because

43:56

it talks about false teachers in fact it prophesies about one false teacher known

44:04

as the man of mockery the man of mockery is described as someone who tries to drown israel

44:12

with lies that spew from his mouth i actually i want to correct myself it doesn't

44:17

describe it as trying to drown israel but it talks about the man of mockery

44:22

spewing lies onto israel well we also find a similar description

44:29

given to us in the book of Revelation for it talks about the dragon trying to drown a woman

44:35

and the woman of course is the bride of Christ it is the church and we have this illustration of the dragon trying to

44:42

drown the woman with the waters that come from his mouth while the waters coming from the mouth of the dragon

44:48

are his lies it's the lies of Satan so Satan is trying to destroy the church

44:54

with the lies that come from his mouth and this or i should say we are given this illustration of water being the

45:00

lies that come from the mouth of the dragon but it's important to understand

45:05

the time period that Satan is held back that his lies can't drown the

45:12

woman for we are told that the woman is protected for a time period of a time times and a half a time well

45:18

one time is one year but it's not your typical one year period

45:23

rather it's talking about a jubilee year and a jubilee year is a 50-year cycle

45:29

so a time is 50 years times is two jubilee years which is a hundred years

45:35

and then a half a time being 25 years for a total of 175 years

45:40

and if we add that to or if we begin that 175 years from the

45:46

point of the beginning of the birth of the church that brings us to approximately 205 a.d and coincidentally

45:53

this is really when the cannon process began and it's at that point that Satan

45:59

began to work very hard to eliminate as much of God's written word as what he could and he's been doing it ever since

46:05

eliminating more and more of God's written word until recently

46:11

we came up with the 66 books of the Protestant Bible and i say recently

46:17

because I'm going to share with you this Bible here this is a Protestant

46:22

king James Bible it's 130 years old and it contains the 14 books of the

46:29

apocrypha it includes the 14 books of the apocrypha so it's more than just 66

46:37

books this is why i say it's really only recently that we've reduced God's written word down to 66

46:44

books now I'd like to go back to the Damascus document again

46:50

for it goes into more detail about false teachers it

46:56

tells us that the religious leaders of the day who were the Pharisees and sadducees

47:01

they would look for gaps in the law this is how the essenes who wrote the dead sea scrolls describe it they described

47:08

their religious leaders as looking for gaps in the law well another

47:13

word for gaps is loopholes that's how we would describe it today that the religious leaders looked for

47:20

loopholes in the law and Yeshua confronted the Pharisees and sadducees regarding this as well

47:27

Yeshua tells us that we are supposed to live more righteous lives than the Pharisees and sadducees he talks about

47:34

the yeast of the Pharisees he talks about the Pharisees and the centuries being hypocrites and the reason he tells

47:41

us is because they focus on those parts of the law that benefit them while they let other

47:48

parts of the law slide so when it benefits them they focus on and they

47:53

force the people to adhere to certain parts of the law but other parts of the law no problem we'll

48:00

let those parts slide Yeshua taught he gives us a good example

48:06

of this regarding getting or helping an animal out of a well when it

48:12

comes to the sabbath that we find the Pharisees confronting Yeshua regarding the sabbath and Yeshua

48:18

says hey you have no problem getting one of your animals out of the

48:23

well on the sabbath well you wouldn't know it

48:28

just from the the writings of the Bible but the essenes believed that on the sabbath you were

48:35

not supposed to help an animal out of the well if it fell into it this was a law of the sabbath so Yeshua

48:43

was actually referring to the Damascus document or at least to the teachings of

48:48

the essenes when it came to the sabbath and he's basically saying hey you look

48:53

for gaps in the law in that you would help an animal one of your animals out

48:59

of a well on the sabbath well this shows that Yeshua is referring

49:05

to writings that fall outside of the Bible and the Damascus document is one

49:11

such document that we can see Yeshua referring to or at least the teachings of the essenes

49:19

now the reason i bring this up is because Paul goes one huge step further

49:24

than simply looking for gaps in the law the Pharisees and sadducees during the time of Yeshua look for gaps in the law

49:31

but Paul goes further in actually doing away with the law tearing the law down

49:36

for this is how Paul describes it he tore down the law

49:43

Paul did away with the law completely so how much worse is that

49:48

than what the Pharisees were doing who simply looked for gaps and loopholes in the law i tell you Paul is by far worse

49:55

than the Pharisees who confronted Yeshua Paul coming after Yeshua and doing away

50:01

with the law proves that he is actually an apostle of Satan

50:07

one of the very apostles that Satan warned that he would be sending

50:19

Scripture is very clear that we are to test the truth of anyone claiming to be a child of God that being anyone

50:25

professing Christ as their lord and savior so we are to test the fruit of people who are professing Christ who

50:32

claim to be a brother and sister in Christ and we do this for a number of reasons one we do it for the protection

50:38

of our very own soul because we want to ensure that we are following a true

50:43

pastor someone who has really been given divine inspiration to lead the church

50:50

and if they have not been given divine inspiration if they are not guided by the holy spirit then they do not hold

50:57

the keys to the kingdom even though they may think they do and they will not enter the kingdom of God they will enter

51:04

the wide gate to hell and they will take anyone who is believing their teachings

51:10

with them so simply for our own good we need to test the fruit of people claiming to be a

51:16

child of God but we also do it for the bride of Christ we do it in an effort to keep the

51:22

bride pure and so we are to test those people claiming to be a child of God claiming

51:29

to be a Christian and if they are living contrary to the teachings of Christ and the apostles

51:35

then we need to rebuke them refute them and reprove them and then if they will not change their

51:41

ways then we need to walk away from them we stop fellowshipping with them this is according to Scripture now when

51:49

it comes to Paul I've already talked about his teachings being contrary to that of Yeshua and the other apostles

51:56

but what I'd like to now do is look at his lifestyle look at the things that he

52:02

actually did look at his actions and his works now I'd like to remind you that

52:07

it's not enough to talk the talk it's not enough to talk about love and faith to talk about the kingdom of God and God

52:13

and how much someone loves God and loves people in general it's not enough to to have lip service

52:22

you must be able to walk the walk and when we actually look at Paul what we see is is that he doesn't walk the walk

52:29

for example when it came to traveling with mark Paul

52:34

proved that he had a hardness of heart and unforgiveness that he talks a lot about forgiveness and love but when it

52:41

came to mark he hung on to a grudge he felt slighted by mark on a previous occasion when they

52:48

were together and they ended up going separate ways so because mark felt he had to travel a different route

52:55

and wasn't going to go with Paul Paul hung on to this grudge and the next time they met

53:01

Paul refused to let mark travel with him even though mark and barnabas wanted to

53:07

and so this goes to show that Paul really didn't have the love

53:14

and the forgiveness in his heart and mercy that he claimed to have

53:19

he talked the talk but he didn't walk the walk and we we need to keep in mind that we don't know why mark did what he did we

53:26

have no idea it's very possible that mark who was an apostle himself who wrote one of the four gospels it's very

53:33

possible that he felt guided by God to go the route that he did he felt guided

53:40

possibly by God having received a word from God to go the route that he that he ended up

53:47

going and so Paul's actions show

53:52

rotten fruit but that's not the only instance what we find when we actually take the

53:58

time to read the Scriptures and go outside of the Bible it becomes obvious that Paul had a

54:05

passive aggressive personality and that he was very envious of the other apostles

54:10

he was very envious and what he did is in order to build himself up Paul tried

54:17

to tear the other apostles down this is how he made himself look good by

54:22

tearing down the other apostles a good example of this has to do with his account of things

54:28

that took place in Antioch he talks about this in Galatians he tells us

54:34

according to his account he confronted Peter and called Peter a hypocrite and he writes about this

54:40

to one of the major churches and so it wasn't enough i mean even if the story were true and he did confront

54:48

Peter it's not the kind of thing that he should have been writing about to the church for anyone and everyone to

54:55

read and to hear about that's something that should have been kept between Paul and Peter

55:00

but there's more to this story and you would know this if you were to read clementine's Homilies

55:08

for we know that Paul claims that we are no longer under the law Peter and James however felt very

55:14

differently Peter understood as did James that they were still under the law and they lived accordingly

55:20

that now that doesn't mean that Peter would no longer eat with gentiles however

55:26

Peter would not eat with gentiles who had not been water baptized for your average gentile your average pagan

55:34

was still considered unclean and Peter would not eat with them he would only eat with someone with a

55:41

gentile who was now considered clean having been water baptized and this is explained in

55:48

clementine's Homilies we learned this in in the the part where

55:53

it tells about clementine and his brothers finally

55:59

finding their mother now they had been separated from their mother for a number of years and in fact their mother

56:05

believed that two of her sons had been killed in a shipwreck and so they hadn't seen each other for a

56:12

good number of years and then their mother finds her three

56:17

sons following and fellowshipping with Peter and so they're all overjoyed at finding

56:24

one another but Peter refused to let her eat with her sons

56:29

until she had been water baptized it didn't matter that she confessed Christ as her lord which she did she

56:37

she said that she was a believer she did believe and wanted to be a Christian

56:43

but Peter refused to let her eat with her sons until she actually was water baptized

56:49

and he wouldn't simply water baptize her because he wouldn't simply baptize her because

56:54

she wanted to be baptized he made her fast for a day before he would baptize

56:59

her and only then could she eat with their sons well knowing this then is

57:05

understandable why Peter would eat with some gentiles in Antioch but wouldn't

57:10

eat with others whereas Paul because he didn't think he was under the law would eat with anyone and everyone Paul tells

57:18

us this he doesn't have a problem with any kind of food even if it's being sacrificed to idols Peter on the other

57:25

hand does have a problem and so he wasn't being a hypocrite in Antioch

57:32

rather he simply refused to eat with those believers who had not yet

57:38

been water baptized this is the true story of what happened

57:43

in Antioch but because we have only the one account and because there is no second witness to what actually happened

57:52

you can't possibly really know what happened unless you read outside of the Bible

57:57

now regarding food when Paul talks about food and how

58:02

there's really no benefit to any particular diet this is really a shot at

58:08

both James and Peter i say this because both James and Peter were staunch vegetarians and again you don't find

58:15

this in the Bible you do find it however in one place Clementine's Homilies and

58:20

the other in the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus i say this because Peter tells us in the

58:28

Homilies that he is a vegetarian that he lives on a staple of bread and olives

58:33

and only occasionally does he eat other fruits and vegetables but he will eat no meat

58:39

James is the same way Josephus tells us this he tells us James would eat no meat

58:45

and more than that he would he lived a life of poverty James rejected wealth of any kind as did

58:53

Peter Peter talks about his frugal living how he only owns one coat

58:58

you know Peter and James both choose a life of poverty and they both live

59:05

on a diet as a vegetarian refusing to eat meat and so this is why

59:11

Paul talks so much about food he's really taking a shot at the

59:17

the apostles who hit the church he is claiming to have superior

59:22

knowledge when it comes to food and he talks about those people who don't have the superior knowledge as

59:29

having weak consciences well this is Paul taking a shot at James and Peter

59:36

and he does the same thing when it comes to marriage for we find Paul tells us that because he is not married

59:44

he is able to give his all to God he does not have to divide his attention and energy between God and the spouse

59:51

and he talks about this in the very same letter that he also talks about both James and Peter being married

59:59

for he talks about the fact that when these people when these apostles come with their spouse you have no problem

1:00:06

putting them up and feeding them but me i don't put you out like they do i don't ask you

1:00:13

to take care of me but here you are taking care of them and their spouse well there wouldn't have been too much

1:00:21

really to take care of when it came to Peter he only needed some bread and olives

1:00:26

so there really wasn't that much involved in taking care of Peter when he visited

1:00:32

Paul on the on the other hand while he eats anything and everything now Paul

1:00:38

he brings up the fact that they're married and he also talks about in the same letter the fact that

1:00:44

anyone who is married well they're inferior to him because he is able to give everything to

1:00:50

God whereas they can't and once again I'd like to mention that Paul

1:00:55

talks about working harder than all of the other apostles Paul according to himself works harder

1:01:02

than any of the other apostles so this is Paul building himself up by

1:01:08

tearing the other apostles down

1:01:18

it should be obvious by now that there are many contradictions between Paul Yeshua and the two apostles there should

1:01:25

be no doubt now that there are these contradictions the question is how are you going to rationalize and justify are

1:01:32

you going to be like the dispensationalist and say yes there are contradictions but

1:01:37

it's because we entered into a new age and Yeshua appointed Paul as the one who

1:01:43

would hit the church and give us this new information in Revelation regarding the law and regarding salvation and the

1:01:49

work that was done on the cross or will you recognize that Paul is teaching

1:01:55

something very different and because he is teaching something different it shows him to be a false apostle you have to

1:02:02

make that decision now while i have shown you a good number of these contradictions there's one that

1:02:07

i would like to speak specifically to I'd like to uh spend a bit more time on it and that has to do with food that has

1:02:15

been sacrificed to idols for Paul teaches something very different from what the other apostles taught in Yeshua

1:02:22

we find in the Book of Acts that Peter and the other apostles the leaders of the church make it very clear their

1:02:29

letter to the church in Antioch and it's the letter that Paul was given that we are not supposed to eat food

1:02:36

sacrifice the idols no questions about it no exceptions given do not eat food

1:02:43

sacrifice to idols then we find in the book of Revelation Yeshua gives a letter

1:02:49

to the church in criteria and he addresses this matter and he condemns

1:02:54

people from that church who have been eating food sacrificed to idols and

1:03:00

the term that he puts to it or gives it is that these people believe they have

1:03:05

deeper truths that allow them to have uh or to live sexually immoral lives and to

1:03:13

eat food sacrificed to idols they believe in these deeper truths

1:03:18

well Paul talks about having superior knowledge when it comes to food sacrifice to idols in first Corinthians

1:03:25

so it really is Yeshua addressing this idea of having superior knowledge or

1:03:31

deeper truths when it comes to food sacrifice to idols and it's very clear that

1:03:38

Yeshua condemns people who are doing this it doesn't matter what excuse Paul

1:03:43

gives it doesn't matter his reasoning for it we are not to eat food sacrifice

1:03:49

to idols but according to Paul you can you only need to read verse 10 in

1:03:56

chapter 8 of first Corinthians and you will see that Paul is talking about believers being in the temple eating

1:04:03

food sacrifice to idols and he says if you observe such a person who has superior knowledge

1:04:10

so he's describing someone eating food in the temple and this is a believer and he does not

1:04:17

condemn the person for doing it he only has a problem with it if

1:04:22

someone else another believer who doesn't have the superior knowledge if they should see you then their

1:04:28

conscience is going to be offended and they may stumble

1:04:33

while this is contrary it's completely contrary i can't stress it

1:04:39

enough to what Yeshua and the other apostles taught Peter explains it in Clementine's

1:04:46

Homilies that when we eat food sacrificed to idols we are in fact sitting down and eating with

1:04:53

demons and this is why we must not do it if you eat food sacrifice to idols you

1:05:00

are sitting down and sharing a meal with demons

1:05:06

now going back to the church in Thyatira what we see here is another red flag

1:05:13

Yeshua is pointing out that this teaching comes from Paul now you ask why

1:05:19

is this well it's because of the the mention being I'm sorry the mentioning

1:05:25

of the prophetess from Thyatira Yeshua is pointing to a woman from Thyatira who

1:05:33

heads this church and is teaching people sexual immorality and this idea that

1:05:38

they can eat food sacrifice to idols well I've already established that Paul taught this same thing but what you may

1:05:45

not be aware is that in the Book of Acts we are told that Paul baptized a woman

1:05:52

from Thyatira a rich merchant woman from Thyatira this is the first person

1:05:59

that we hear of Paul baptizing in asia minor and it's a woman from Thyatira

1:06:05

and then what we find is approximately 30 to 40 years after Paul's death for

1:06:11

this is when the book of Revelation was written we find Yeshua condemning a

1:06:16

woman from Thyatira for teaching the very same things that Paul did so this is a

1:06:22

connection that Yeshua is pointing out to us we find this connection another red flag

1:06:29

another signpost in the Scripture pointing to Paul being a false apostle he taught this woman from Thyatira and

1:06:37

Yeshua condemned that woman for her teachings

1:06:49

sticking with the letter that Yeshua wrote to the church in Thyatira I'd like to address that part of the letter that

1:06:54

speaks to sexual immorality for this too is written due to the teachings of Paul

1:07:01

Paul taught sexual immorality by way of divorce and remarriage

1:07:07

i say this because Paul taught that if you were a believer who were married to an unbeliever and that unbeliever left

1:07:14

you then according to Paul you are no longer legally bound to that person well

1:07:20

no longer legally bound means you can then legally remarry this is what Paul

1:07:26

taught but Yeshua never taught such an exception there was no exception to his

1:07:33

law to his rules and commandments regarding divorce and remarriage according to Yeshua there are no

1:07:40

exceptions you cannot divorce and then remarry you are bound to your spouse for

1:07:47

life the only way you can legally remarry is if your spouse dies

1:07:52

if you divorce them then you simply remain unmarried you do not divorce and remarry no

1:08:00

exceptions to the rule according to Yeshua but then Paul comes along and says hey there is now a new exception to

1:08:08

this rule because we're talking about believers and unbelievers now it's great

1:08:13

if you are married to an unbeliever that you stay together you do everything in your power to remain together however if

1:08:20

your unbelieving spouse leaves you then you are no longer legally bound to that

1:08:26

person well this is what Yeshua is referring to when he writes the church

1:08:32

in Thyatira at least it is one of the sexual immorality issue yes there may

1:08:38

have been others as well but make no mistake about it Paul's teaching regarding divorce and

1:08:44

remarriage telling us that we can legally remarry if an unbeliever spouse

1:08:50

leaves us this is a lie it was only taught by Paul and no one else and it's why Yeshua is addressing the issue to

1:08:58

the church in Thyatira so these are two teachings that Yeshua addresses

1:09:03

regarding the prophetess and fire tear this woman from Thyatira and i tell you it's the same woman the

1:09:10

reason it is even mentioned is so that we can see the connection between Paul

1:09:16

and this prophetess for Paul baptized a woman from Thyatira and

1:09:22

think about the number of times that it's mentioned in Scripture of Paul baptizing someone think about

1:09:29

the the very few people that we are told he baptizes and one of them is this woman

1:09:36

from Thyatira and then we find a prophetess from Thyatira being condemned

1:09:41

for teaching the very same kinds of things that Paul taught this is Yeshua showing us without

1:09:49

question that Paul is a false apostle but Christians today don't want to

1:09:55

recognize it even when i point it out to them they want to ignore the evidence but Paul introduced a new rule regarding

1:10:04

divorce and remarriage and it's a rule that was never taught by anyone else and since then

1:10:11

people the the church rather has even extended that line in the sand they keep drawing a new line taking it back

1:10:18

further and further until today was being taught in the church as well you can't out sin God's grace and you

1:10:24

are no longer bound to the law that means you can divorce and remarry as many times as you want and so we find

1:10:30

people in the church today living every which way as the world does

1:10:36

divorcing and remarrying you know it's all due to the teachings

1:10:43

of Paul the catholic church for example and the introduction of annulments

1:10:50

it's based on the teachings of Paul for it certainly has nothing to do with what Yeshua taught Yeshua taught very strict

1:10:57

laws regarding divorce if you divorce then you live

1:11:03

separate for the rest of your life you never remarry it's very clear

1:11:08

so Paul is teaching sexual immorality he's endorsing adultery with this new rule

1:11:16

that he introduced regarding believers and unbelievers

1:11:40

Paul tells us in first Corinthians that is not possible to confess Christ as your lord except by the holy spirit so

1:11:47

according to Paul if someone is confessing Christ as their lord it is because they've had the

1:11:52

Revelation of who Christ is and they have the holy spirit in them this is the only possible way anyone can confess

1:12:00

Christ as their lord well the problem with this is that we know this is not true it's obvious that this is an

1:12:07

outright lie now when it comes to Christians who want to believe this what they will do is twist

1:12:14

the meaning of what Paul is saying they understand that there are many Christians who confess Christ as their

1:12:20

lord and so this passage can't possibly mean what it's saying and so they they

1:12:26

twist the words of Paul what they end up doing is believing or rather I'm sorry they end

1:12:32

up reading what they believe instead of simply believing what they read because if they believe what they read

1:12:40

they would understand that this is showing Paul to be a false apostle

1:12:45

now then there are other Christians who accept this at face value they understand that this is what Paul is

1:12:51

saying and of course according to them Paul is a true apostle and if he says it it must be true it must be factual and

1:12:59

so there are those Christians who accept this passage at face value and they have created doctrine and theology around

1:13:06

this passage it's called easy buddhism others will call it once saved always

1:13:12

saved and by faith alone there are those Christians who honestly believe that if they are on the street

1:13:18

corner preaching to people and after spending 15 minutes with them if they can convince them to

1:13:24

say a sinner's prayer and confess Christ as their lord well from that point on that person is saved they cannot

1:13:31

possibly lose their salvation and the reason is because they believe this

1:13:36

passage from Paul that you can't confess Christ as your lord unless you have the

1:13:41

holy spirit in you so according to these people anyone confessing Christ as their lord on the

1:13:48

street corner after a 15-minute teaching on Christ while then that person is

1:13:53

guaranteed their salvation the holy spirit will never leave them they can never lose their salvation

1:14:00

judgment day is suspended for these people well the problem with this is

1:14:05

that it's an outright lie we know it simply from Scripture if people would actually read Scripture

1:14:11

they would see that this proves or that Scripture proves Paul to be a liar

1:14:16

Yeshua tells us this himself when he talks about those people those believers who confess him as their lord

1:14:23

and they perform miracles in his name and yet he tells them get away from me worker of iniquity i never knew you

1:14:30

and what does worker of iniquity mean if not being a sinner this is what Yeshua

1:14:36

is saying he tells us there will be emphatic believers people who will call

1:14:41

him lord lord and that's what it means when the the word lord is repeated twice it's

1:14:47

like underlining it it's putting it in capital letters it's highlighting it that these are emphatic believers and

1:14:54

yet Yeshua will say get away from me i never knew you you worker of iniquity

1:15:02

this then is proof that people can confess Christ as their lord and not have the holy spirit in them for if they

1:15:08

ever even at one point had the holy spirit in them Yeshua

1:15:14

could not possibly say i never knew you the reason is the gift of the holy

1:15:20

spirit is from God and Yeshua is the son of God and he is God himself he is one

1:15:25

third of the holy trinity so if someone even for a moment had the

1:15:30

holy spirit in them at least for that moment Yeshua would have known them but he says get away from me i never knew

1:15:38

you it's obvious then that people can confess Christ as their lord and not have the holy spirit in them

1:15:45

and this is expanded upon in clementine's Homilies Peter talks about

1:15:50

a specific instance when Yeshua is talking to one of his followers and says hey

1:15:57

why do you call me lord and not do as i command you that you confess me as your lord but you don't do

1:16:04

what i instruct you to do well this is Peter explaining to us that people can

1:16:09

confess them as their lord and not have the holy spirit in them then we have the story in the book of

1:16:15

acts regarding believers in samaria we find in this story that the apostle

1:16:21

philip goes into samaria and he's preaching and teaching there and many people become

1:16:26

believers and become water baptized and then philip goes on his way he leaves

1:16:32

sometime later Peter comes into samaria and he finds all of these believers who had been water baptized and yet had not

1:16:39

received the gift of the holy spirit they were believers true believers

1:16:46

confessing Christ as their lord they had been water baptized and yet did not have

1:16:51

the holy spirit so this proves people can confess Christ as their lord

1:16:56

and not have the holy spirit that they don't even have the holy spirit in them to give them the Revelation of who

1:17:04

Christ is they've confessed him as their lord without having the holy spirit in them

1:17:11

and then we find that Peter lays his hands on these believers many of them

1:17:16

and they receive the gift of the holy spirit but there's one person Simon the magician

1:17:21

who asked to buy this gift from Peter and Peter condemns him and says hey forgive it

1:17:26

you are wicked you are evil i am not laying my hands on you but so we find here that Peter

1:17:33

actually denies the gift of the holy spirit Peter is able to hold back the

1:17:38

gift so that someone does not receive the gift of the holy spirit even though that

1:17:45

person had been water baptized and had confessed Christ as his lord

1:17:51

so this idea that you automatically receive the gift of the holy spirit or

1:17:56

that you can't confess Christ as your lord unless you have the holy spirit well it's a lie it's an obvious lie that

1:18:03

is shown to be a lie in Scripture so my brothers and sisters how is it

1:18:10

that you believe Paul can be a true apostle if he's told such a grievous lie

1:18:17

and this is a very serious lie that has resulted in many false doctrines and

1:18:23

teachings that it's resulted in the growth of the apostate church

1:18:28

anyone believing and teaching easy believism it is because of the teachings

1:18:33

of Paul

1:18:41

the strongest argument for Paul and the one passage that his supporters

1:18:47

will inevitably bring up is found in ii Peter it's a very short passage where

1:18:53

according to the supporters of Paul Peter is declaring Paul a brother and more than that declares his writings his

1:19:01

letters as Scripture and that's enough for the supporters of Paul but can we trust this very short passage or is it

1:19:08

possible that a scribe has inserted this passage i believe that that really is the case

1:19:14

and i'll be explaining why in a moment but before i get into my argument I'd like to share with you a short video

1:19:20

clip of a Christian youtuber by the name of techton tv now tekton is a staunch supporter of

1:19:29

Paul he believes without question without doubt that Paul is a true apostle he also believes that the Bible is the

1:19:36

infallible word of God but what you will find in the clip that I'm going to share with you and actually

1:19:43

one more point I'd like to bring up is he considers himself a Bible scholar and he has followers who believe that he's a

1:19:49

Bible scholar so this is somebody that we should be able to trust this is somebody in the know

1:19:55

who really understands the Bible well what you will find in the clip that

1:20:01

I'm sharing with you is when it's convenient for tekton he argues that not every time we find

1:20:08

the word Scripture in the Bible is it actually referring to the inspired word of God sometimes according to this Bible

1:20:15

scholar when we find the word Scripture it's actually only simply referring to

1:20:22

writings just writings in general could be referring to any writing but it does

1:20:27

not always refer to the inspired word of God so

1:20:33

please take a moment watch his clip or watch the clip from his video and then

1:20:38

i'll come back and share my thoughts so let's close with one final question

1:20:46

in john 7 38 what document is Jesus referring to none

1:20:54

you're sure yes dr martzer

1:20:59

actually it's not an exact quote it's an allusion to a saying in the book of

1:21:04

sirach chapter 24 verses 30 through 32.

1:21:10

wait a minute here Jesus says the Scripture says that what are you a catholic

1:21:17

no but the word used simply means any written document it doesn't apply

1:21:23

exclusively to the Old Testament

1:21:28

now I'd like to be very clear here when i read the word Scripture in the Bible or in non-canonical writings i believe

1:21:34

it's speaking about the inspired word of God so i believe it means

1:21:39

Scripture as in the sense most people think of the word Scripture my point for sharing this video clip

1:21:46

with you is that there are those Bible scholars at least people who consider themselves Bible

1:21:52

scholars that believe sometimes when we read the word Scripture it's not really

1:21:57

speaking about the inspired word of God it's not speaking about inspired writings but rather writings in general

1:22:05

and if you are such a Christian if you have ever argued this point then you

1:22:10

cannot argue with any certainty that Peter is actually referring to Paul's writings as

1:22:17

being inspired rather he's simply referring to them as writings

1:22:23

now I'd also like to make it clear here that i believe ii Peter was in fact written by the apostle Peter however

1:22:29

when it comes to the passage that speaks to apostle Paul well that's a different story that short passage of one and a

1:22:36

half verses was added by a scribe at some point in time to add credence and

1:22:41

greater weight to the writings of Paul and as evidence that this kind of thing was going on and could easily have been

1:22:49

done I'd like to refer you to a writing of Peter's that didn't make it into the canon

1:22:55

it's a writing that is though important in understanding how his writings were

1:23:02

being corrupted for Peter explains to James that even while he was still alive

1:23:07

there were those people who were twisting and corrupting his teachings and writings

1:23:13

and for this reason he gave instructions to James that his letters meaning Peter's letters should

1:23:20

not be given to anyone and everyone that his writings and teachings weren't for the general public but rather for the

1:23:27

initiate and in fact he goes so far as to say his letters were not to be given

1:23:33

to people until they had proven themselves over a number of years and then only

1:23:38

show them only share with them one or two of his letters and only after they proved themselves

1:23:46

after reading some of his letters should they be given more well this lines up with second estrus

1:23:53

which talks about 70 books that were for the initiate only well 24 were for the

1:23:59

general public 24 books for anyone and everyone but 70 that were for the initiate owning and what we see is that

1:24:07

Peter is continuing with that kind of teaching he understood that his teachings would

1:24:14

be corrupted and i believe that's what we see happening in his letter in this second epistle

1:24:20

somebody at some point in time corrupted his writings by adding this short

1:24:26

passage now as other evidence of this I'm going to read the passage

1:24:32

with the part about Paul in it and then I'm going to read it taking out that short one and a half

1:24:39

verse passage so first with Paul's passage in it beginning in verse 14.

1:24:46

and so dear friends while you are waiting for these things to happen make every effort to be found living peaceful

1:24:52

lives that are pure and blameless in his sight and remember our lord's patience gives

1:24:58

people time to be saved that is what our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you

1:25:03

with the wisdom God gave him speaking of these things in all of his letters some

1:25:08

of his comments are hard to understand and those who are ignorant and unstable have twisted his letters to mean

1:25:14

something quite different just as they do with other parts of Scripture and this will result in their destruction

1:25:22

and now I'm going to read that same passage but I'm going to leave out the part about Paul and skip to verse 17.

1:25:30

and so dear friends while you are waiting for these things to happen make every effort to be found living peaceful

1:25:36

lives that are pure and blameless in his sight and remember our lord's patience gives people time to

1:25:43

be saved i am warning you ahead of time dear friends be on guard so that you will not be carried away by the heirs of

1:25:50

these wicked people and lose your own secure footing do you see how it flows there you can

1:25:56

take out the part about paw and the passage flows equally well

1:26:03

this shows then that at least it's a possibility that this passage was

1:26:08

inserted because you could insert it and not even change the flow of the

1:26:13

passage now regarding the fact that Peter refers to Paul as a brother this too

1:26:20

is a sign that it wasn't written by Peter because if Peter really was referring to someone that has written

1:26:28

the inspired word of God has written what we would consider Scripture do you really think he would just refer to him

1:26:34

as a brother for anyone that would be part of the congregation all followers

1:26:40

would be considered a brother however brothers would not or the term brother

1:26:45

would not be referred to as someone who has written the inspired word of God rather you would give them a higher

1:26:52

title than that greater acknowledgement you would for example call them a prophet or an apostle so the fact that

1:27:01

Peter is referring to Paul merely as a brother is actually an insult because we

1:27:07

find earlier in his letter here that he refers to apostles

1:27:13

so he's already spoken about apostles but when it comes to Paul he only calls him a brother

1:27:19

so this really would be a slight and there's no way he would call someone a brother who has

1:27:26

written the inspired word of God then what about the fact that Peter says his writings are difficult

1:27:33

that people confuse his writings while i ask you is God our father a God of confusion i tell you

1:27:40

he's not and there's no way if somebody was inspired by God and if they were writing

1:27:46

the inspired word of God that it would sound confusing that simply is not the

1:27:52

way of God so the mere fact that his writings are being called confusing and difficult to

1:27:59

understand while that goes to show that it's not the inspired word of God

1:28:04

and what about the fact that Peter is actually calling the writings of Paul Scripture while Paul is still alive

1:28:11

i ask you is there any precedence for this in Scripture i tell you there isn't

1:28:18

so this idea of Peter calling Paul's writings Scripture calling them the

1:28:23

inspired word of God prior to any council being convened i tell you it would not have happened so

1:28:30

there's no way no way whatsoever that Peter would ever have called Paul's writings the inspired

1:28:37

word of God and called them Scripture without having convened a council to

1:28:43

determine it because they had gone 400 years

1:28:48

400 years which are known as the silent years where there were no prophets no

1:28:54

writings and yet we're to believe that Paul comes along writes a few letters

1:29:00

and Peter refers to his writings as Scripture well i tell you this would be a huge thing

1:29:05

monumental that we have someone new for the first time in over 400 years writing the word

1:29:12

of God that would have been so huge you would hear other apostles and other

1:29:18

prophets writing about it it wouldn't simply be one and a half verses slipped in in

1:29:24

second Peter we would have been hearing a whole lot more about Paul's

1:29:30

wondrous writings by the other apostles if in fact it had been declared that his writings were Scripture so

1:29:37

this identifies it shows really that there should be no question

1:29:43

that this passage had been slipped in by a scribe at some point in time

1:29:54

it should be apparent to all by now that Paul's gospel contradicts the gospel of Yeshua and the other apostles but more

1:30:00

than that there are times when Paul actually contradicts himself and this is nowhere more apparent than

1:30:07

on his teaching regarding sin and the treatment of women for when it comes to

1:30:12

sin and salvation and the work of Christ on the cross when it

1:30:18

comes to these things according to Paul according to the historical facts that

1:30:23

he lays out sin entered the world through adam but then when it comes to another topic

1:30:29

when it comes to the treatment of women and the role that they can play in the church well then no sin didn't enter the

1:30:36

world through adam but rather it entered through eve and because sin entered the

1:30:42

world through a woman because it is a woman that was deceived by Satan while

1:30:47

women are to remain subservant to men and they must remain silent in the church now

1:30:53

in his teachings regarding women Paul on one occasion talks about the law

1:31:00

and then in another place he talks about tradition and the fact that it's always been a particular way and it should

1:31:07

remain that way so according to Paul men are no longer

1:31:12

under the law they don't have to be circumcised and so on but when it comes to women they are

1:31:19

to remain under the law and worse remain true to tradition

1:31:24

so this shows Paul to contradict himself and it shows that he is very biased when

1:31:31

it comes to women and he changes the historical facts when it comes to

1:31:38

one particular teaching and it just goes to show

1:31:43

that Paul did not receive his Revelation and understanding from Yeshua but rather

1:31:49

from an imitation Christ and i say this because Yeshua himself teaches against

1:31:55

what Paul is saying regarding women for we find in the gospel according to thomas and i need to make this clear for

1:32:02

some Christians because some people get two different gospels mixed up

1:32:08

I'm not talking about the gospel of thomas but rather the gospel according to thomas two very different writings

1:32:15

the gospel according to thomas is filled with teachings and sayings of Christ and

1:32:21

what he tells us in this gospel is that he was going to make women as men

1:32:28

that women in other words were going to be equal to men no longer subservient to

1:32:33

them and so his teaching regarding women contradicts that of Paul

1:32:39

and Paul would have known this if he'd actually be taught by the true messiah

1:32:45

but instead he was taught by an imitation Christ and this is why he remains biased towards women for Satan

1:32:52

hates women Satan is a hater of women and we see Paul also

1:33:00

treating women very differently than men trying to keep them subservant trying to

1:33:05

keep them silent in the church going so far as to say if a woman has a question

1:33:11

they aren't supposed to ask it in the church but rather wait until they get home and ask their spouse well

1:33:18

what happens when that spouse doesn't really have an interest in what is being said in the church what happens when

1:33:25

that spouse simply has a poor understanding of what is being taught a poor understanding of

1:33:32

salvation and of Christ well his interpretation of what is said is going to poorly reflect the true

1:33:39

gospel and so he's going to teach his spouse and his children something very different perhaps of what was actually

1:33:46

being taught but the woman has no choice but to follow the teachings of her

1:33:51

spouse because she could not ask questions to the teacher directly she couldn't actually ask the pastor the

1:33:59

teacher or the preacher directly herself she had to wait till she gets home she

1:34:05

had to remain silent even though Yeshua talks about men and

1:34:10

women prophesying in the future women according to Paul are still

1:34:16

supposed to remain silent well it just goes once again to show Paul to be a

1:34:21

false apostle

1:34:31

we find in the Old Testament writing known as zechariah a prophecy about God making a new covenant with all nations

1:34:38

well there is only one such covenant and that is the new covenant that we are living under today the New Testament age

1:34:46

this is what is spoken about in their prophecy found in zechariah and you

1:34:52

covenant and it's what we are living under today and that might sound good if you've

1:34:57

never actually read this passage unfortunately it's not good because what

1:35:03

we are told is that God will break that covenant God will break the new covenant

1:35:09

that is made with all nations now this flies in the face of what many people believe and teach

1:35:15

for there are many Christians who teach that God cannot break his covenant we can we can turn

1:35:21

our backs on God but God can never turn us back on us God can never be the one to break the covenant well that's a lie

1:35:28

because it clearly tells us in zechariah that God will break this new covenant

1:35:34

which is the New Testament age that we are living in and i tell you the reason he breaks it is because of the condition

1:35:40

that he finds the bride of Christ in for when we become born again we are given roads of righteousness and these robes

1:35:47

of righteousness are a gift that we are expected to treat properly

1:35:53

and if come judgment day we are found to be wearing robes of righteousness that are tattered and torn

1:35:59

and muddied while we will pay a very dear price for it you will be found guilty and you will be

1:36:06

punished beyond anything that you can imagine you better return the robe of

1:36:13

righteousness in the same condition that it's given you you better take heed of this warming in zechariah that God will

1:36:20

break his covenant with the bride of Christ this new covenant that we are living under

1:36:26

now something that speaks more to this is found in the book of Revelation and it has to do with what the two witnesses

1:36:33

are going to be wearing for we are told they will be wearing burlap and the reason someone wears burlap is because

1:36:39

they are in deep sorrow and mourning and so the two witnesses will be in deep sorrow and mourning over the condition

1:36:46

of the bride of Christ these two witnesses are going to have a dual purpose one is to be a witness for

1:36:52

Christ but the other is to be a witness against this evil wicked generation and i tell you it will be because of the

1:36:59

apostate church they will be in deep sorrow and mourning because God breaks

1:37:05

his covenant with the bride of Christ so many Christians don't want to believe

1:37:11

this but it's there it's very clear in Scripture so this idea of once saved

1:37:17

always say that you can't lose your salvation that you can't all sin God's grace well

1:37:22

it's very clear in Scripture that you can outsin God's grace and most have

1:37:30

now I'd like to end just having a short discussion on who is

1:37:35

going to be found more wanting and more guilty if you will or who is going to be held more

1:37:41

accountable if they are deceived by the false apostle Paul will it be the person who actually lived

1:37:47

during the time period of Paul and heard his words personally or will we be held to a greater accountability will we

1:37:55

suffer greater punishment if we are the ones to fall victim to Paul's lies

1:38:00

now i know one argument can be made that while there are so many different denominations it's hard to tell what is

1:38:06

the truth who is teaching the truth but i tell you it would have been far more difficult during the time of Paul

1:38:12

because there would have been many people who would have only heard the teachings of Paul he would have been the

1:38:18

only one that they heard from so they would have only heard the imitation Christ being taught by Paul they would

1:38:25

have only heard the false gospel of Paul's however today we don't have the luxury

1:38:31

of that excuse we have 13 letters from Paul and so we

1:38:37

are able to compare them and see the contradictions among his own writings whereas those people who lived during

1:38:43

the time period of Paul well the chances are many of them would not have even been able to read his letters because

1:38:50

they could not read themselves even if they had the letter in their hands

1:38:55

and then for others they would have only been able to hear or read the letter

1:39:00

that was sent to their particular church for it would have taken years and decades for Paul's letters to circulate

1:39:07

and so they didn't have the benefit of being able to compare Paul's letters from one church to another

1:39:13

we however have that benefit and then there's the fact that we can also compare Paul's letters to that of

1:39:20

the other apostles and to that of Yeshua's teachings found by way of the

1:39:27

gospels so we have many benefits that those people who heard from Paul personally

1:39:34

didn't have and so we have no excuse there is no excuse for falling victim to

1:39:40

the lies of Paul when we can compare his teachings to that of the true apostles

1:39:45

and Yeshua and we don't just have what we find in the Bible as I've tried to stress there are many other writings

1:39:52

clementine's Homilies uh the uh shepherd of hermes these are

1:39:58

two very important writings that if you were to read them you would see very clearly

1:40:04

that the road to salvation that's taught in these writings is very different

1:40:10

from what Paul taught and so i would ask you to consider the information that's being presented to

1:40:16

you and consider what I'm saying here that you will be held accountable and you will have no

1:40:22

excuse whatsoever for falling victim to the teachings of Paul because you can read

1:40:27

you can read and you can hear the differences and see the differences between the teachings of Paul

1:40:33

and the true apostles and Yeshua so i suggest that you wake up wake up

1:40:38

to the reality of the true gospel and throw away the gospel of Paul

1:40:46

throw away his false teachings for i tell you this Roman road to salvation that so many

1:40:52

people talk about it is not a road to salvation but a road to destruction the

1:40:58

Roman road is a path to destruction and you better learn how and where

1:41:04

you can find the narrow path that is difficult but that leads to the kingdom

1:41:09

of God all right that's about all i have to say except I'd like to reiterate the fact that if i

1:41:17

am in air i truly do want to know about it but you must do it with Scripture and

1:41:22

so i encourage anyone to create a video response even if you actually agree with

1:41:27

me i encourage people to share their gospel

1:41:34

and if I'm wrong i want to know about it as always i look forward to comments and

1:41:39

messages may you and yours be abundantly blessed